Overview

RESOURCES, ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

12.6

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

85.7 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

95.2 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 85.7%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

RESOURCES, ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 2.5 5.4 5.6 10.1 4.3 13.8 11.6 53.4 97.7% 1.0
Article, other NA NA 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.2 NA 1.1 100.0% 1.0
Conference paper, peer review 1.0 1.1 0.7 2.9 1.7 2.9 NA 10.2 23.5% 0.7
Conference paper, other NA 1.6 0.8 1.5 0.5 1.0 NA 5.3 0.0% 0.0
Chapter in book NA NA NA NA NA 0.5 NA 0.5 0.0% 1.0
Proceeding (editor) NA 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA 0.5 0.0% 0.0
Report 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.5 0.0% 0.0
Doctoral thesis 1.0 1.0 2.0 NA 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 0.0% 0.0
Licentiate thesis 1.0 NA NA NA NA 1.0 NA 2.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 8 16 19 22 16 37 33 151 97.4% 1
Article, other NA NA 2 2 1 1 NA 6 100.0% 1
Conference paper, peer review 3 3 1 7 3 6 NA 23 43.5% 1
Conference paper, other NA 3 1 3 1 2 NA 10 0.0% 0
Chapter in book NA NA NA NA NA 1 NA 1 0.0% 1
Proceeding (editor) NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 0
Report 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 0
Doctoral thesis 1 1 2 NA 1 1 1 7 0.0% 0
Licentiate thesis 1 NA NA NA NA 1 NA 2 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

RESOURCES, ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 2.4 17.0 7.2 0.1 4.7%
2015 6.0 30.0 5.0 0.1 1.2%
2016 5.9 19.8 3.4 0.7 12.1%
2017 11.6 57.2 4.9 1.8 15.9%
2018 4.4 34.5 7.8 0.5 11.3%
Total 30.3 158.4 5.2 3.2 10.7%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 13.2 1.21 1.2 9.3%
2015-2017 21.0 1.19 2.6 12.3%
2016-2018 19.9 1.07 2.8 14.0%
2017-2019 27.8 1.25 5.2 18.8%
Total 41.0 1.24 6.5 15.8%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 9 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 67%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 42 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 96.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

RESOURCES, ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 13.2 1.50 6.5 49.1%
2015-2017 21.0 1.51 11.2 53.0%
2016-2018 19.9 1.52 10.2 51.1%
2017-2019 27.8 1.44 12.4 44.7%
2018-2020 29.2 1.37 11.5 39.4%
Total 52.3 1.43 23.4 44.8%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 42 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 96.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

RESOURCES, ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 43 8 18.6% 24 55.8%
2015-2017 57 9 15.8% 28 49.1%
2016-2018 57 11 19.3% 32 56.1%
2017-2019 73 16 21.9% 37 50.7%
2018-2020 84 28 33.3% 47 56.0%
Total 148 37 25.0% 79 53.4%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 43 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 97.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
United States 27 26 1 0 0 5.0
Italy 22 21 1 0 0 4.4
United Kingdom 15 12 3 0 0 3.3
China 10 10 0 0 0 2.7
Finland 7 7 0 0 0 2.5
Israel 12 11 1 0 0 2.1
Germany 12 11 1 0 0 2.1
Spain 11 9 2 0 0 2.0
Netherlands 7 7 0 0 0 1.6
Switzerland 5 4 1 0 0 1.4
Croatia 4 4 0 0 0 1.1
Australia 6 5 1 0 0 0.9
Kenya 5 4 1 0 0 0.8
France 5 4 1 0 0 0.7
Pakistan 3 3 0 0 0 0.7
Ukraine 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Canada 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
Republic of Serbia 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
New Zealand 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Norway 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Portugal 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Austria 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Bangladesh 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Brazil 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
India 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Russian Federation 1 1 0 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences University Sweden 22 20 2 0 0 6.1
Stockholm University University Sweden 12 11 1 0 0 3.8
Skanska AB Company Sweden 6 6 0 0 0 3.5
Roma Tre University University Italy 13 13 0 0 0 2.4
Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute Other Public Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 2.2
Tel Aviv University University Israel 11 11 0 0 0 2.1
Uppsala University University Sweden 8 8 0 0 0 1.9
University of Manchester University United Kingdom 6 6 0 0 0 1.8
Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) Institute Finland 5 5 0 0 0 1.8
Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science (CNDS) Institute Sweden 7 7 0 0 0 1.6
Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC) University Spain 7 7 0 0 0 1.5
Stockholm Exergi Company Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.4
Lund University University Sweden 6 5 1 0 0 1.3
Ecoloop AB Company Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.3
University of Split University Croatia 4 4 0 0 0 1.1
IHE Delft Institute for Water Education Institute Netherlands 5 5 0 0 0 1.0
University of Birmingham University United Kingdom 5 4 1 0 0 0.9
University of Trento University Italy 6 5 1 0 0 0.9
Swedish Environmental Research Institute Institute Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 0.9
Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Company Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 0.9
University of Nairobi University Kenya 5 4 1 0 0 0.8
Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB) Institute Germany 5 4 1 0 0 0.8
University of Amsterdam University Netherlands 4 4 0 0 0 0.8
Pennsylvania State University University United States 4 4 0 0 0 0.7
World Agroforestry Institute Kenya 4 4 0 0 0 0.7
University of Padova University Italy 3 3 0 0 0 0.7
Northern Illinois University (NIU) University United States 3 3 0 0 0 0.7
COWI A/S Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Shaoxing Univ NA China 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Government of Pakistan Other Public Pakistan 3 3 0 0 0 0.7
Posiva Oy Company Finland 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd. (YREC) Company China 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Parthenope University of Naples University Italy 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
Karlstad University University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin University Germany 4 3 1 0 0 0.5
Vanderbilt University University United States 4 3 1 0 0 0.5
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) Institute Germany 4 4 0 0 0 0.5
Leuphana University of Lüneburg University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Institute Ukraine 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Belgrade University Republic of Serbia 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Tübingen University Germany 4 4 0 0 0 0.5
University of Zurich University Switzerland 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Utrecht University University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Lyon University France 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag) Institute Switzerland 2 1 1 0 0 0.5
China Three Gorges University (CTGU) University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Utah State University University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Uniper AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.4
Lamar University University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL) University Switzerland 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Umeå University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.4
University of Canterbury University New Zealand 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
University of Southern California University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
University of California, Berkeley University United States 3 3 0 0 0 0.4
University of Jena University Germany 3 3 0 0 0 0.4
Amphos 21 Company Spain 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Flinders University University Australia 3 2 1 0 0 0.4
Beijing Normal University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Deltares Institute Netherlands 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Environmental Resources Management Company United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Los Alamos National Laboratory Institute United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Politecnico di Milano University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Stockholms Municipal Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Sweco AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Siena University Italy 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
WSP AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Indiana University Bloomington University United States 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
University of Geosciences University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
University of Oulu University Finland 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
University at Buffalo (SUNY) University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Innventia AB Institute Sweden 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Natl Field Observat & Res Stn Landslides Three Go NA China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Pompeu Fabra University University Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Sun Yat-sen University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Calgary University Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Liverpool University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Newcastle University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
National Research Council (CNR) Other Public Italy 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
CAS Ctr Excellence Tibetan Plateau Earth Sci NA China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Centre for Environmental and Geographic Information Services (CEGIS) Other Public Bangladesh 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
China Univ Min & Technol NA China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Envix Nord AB NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
European Commission Other Public Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Forschungszentrum Julich Institute Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Hohai University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Incipientus Ultrasound Flow Technol AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Nonferrous Geol Explorat & Res Inst Ltd Liabil Co Company China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Sichuan Agricultural University (SAU) University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Lisbon University Portugal 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University School for Advanced Studies IUSS Institute Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
CSGI (Research Center for Colloids and Nanoscience) Institute Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Delft University of Technology University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca University Other Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
National Technical University of Ukraine Kiev Polytechnic Institute University Ukraine 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Other Public United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Technical University of Munich University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Bari Aldo Moro University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Cassino and Southern Lazio University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Oslo University Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Other Public Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Inria Institute France 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe) Institute Kenya 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Northwestern University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Norwegian University of Science and Technology University Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Oxford Brookes University University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Polytechnic University of Turin University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
StadtLABOR Company Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
United States Geological Survey Other Public United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Florida University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Melbourne University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Free University of Brussels University Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Tohoku University University Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Mons University Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Potsdam University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Rennes 1 University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Victoria University Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation Other Public Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) Other Public India 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
International Atomic Energy Agency Other Public Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
National Nuclear Energy Commission (CNEN) Other Public Brazil 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Aarhus University University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
AGH University of Science and Technology University Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Ecologic Institute Institute Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Other Public Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
LandboSyd Company Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Russian Academy of Sciences Other Public Russian Federation 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
CGIAR Syst Org NA France 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
IITA NA Kenya 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Karolinska Institutet University Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC) University College United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
World Agroforestry ICRAF NA Kenya 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev University Israel 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Cranfield University University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Darmstadt University of Technology University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Eastern Alps District Authority Other Public Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
ETH Zurich University Switzerland 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (JKI) Institute Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Freie Universität Berlin University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Institute for Hygiene and Environment Institute Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC) Institute Portugal 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Instituto de Telecomunicações Institute Portugal 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
IWW Water Centre Institute Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Leibniz University Hannover University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
National Distance Education University (UNED) University Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
NATURALEA CONSERVACIO SL Company Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Technical University of Berlin University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Universidade Aberta (UAb) University Portugal 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Bayreuth University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Kent University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Minho University Portugal 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Porto University Portugal 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Roehampton University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD) University Portugal 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Western Australia University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Urban Ecology Agency of Barcelona Other Public Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Open Access

RESOURCES, ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 10 4 1 0 1 2 6 40.0%
2015 18 7 1 0 1 5 11 38.9%
2016 20 8 0 0 7 1 12 40.0%
2017 27 15 6 2 4 3 12 55.6%
2018 17 13 3 5 3 2 4 76.5%
2019 39 30 12 14 4 0 9 76.9%
2020 33 26 5 20 1 0 7 78.8%
Total 164 103 28 41 21 13 61 62.8%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

RESOURCES, ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 3.4 95.0 27.7 0.5 14.6%
2015 6.5 160.1 24.6 0.5 7.7%
2016 5.9 50.9 8.7 0.8 13.5%
2017 12.0 140.3 11.7 1.1 9.3%
2018 5.4 62.0 11.4 1.0 18.4%
2019 16.9 129.1 7.7 5.0 29.6%
2020 11.4 37.0 3.3 2.5 21.9%
Total 61.5 674.4 11.0 11.4 18.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 11 (full counted) publications with good Scopus coverage (at least 88.5%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 14.8 1.71 3.2 21.4%
2015-2017 23.6 1.44 4.3 18.1%
2016-2018 22.1 1.18 3.6 16.4%
2017-2019 29.7 1.36 6.4 21.6%
Total 44.6 1.47 9.6 21.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 49 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 88.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 13.8 1.69 11.5 83.8%
2015-2017 21.6 1.66 19.3 89.2%
2016-2018 20.4 1.71 18.1 88.7%
2017-2019 28.7 1.73 23.5 82.0%
2018-2020 29.7 1.89 24.2 81.4%
Total 53.8 1.78 45.0 83.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 49 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 88.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 49 3 6.1% 27 55.1%
2015-2017 67 4 6.0% 33 49.3%
2016-2018 66 6 9.1% 35 53.0%
2017-2019 89 10 11.2% 43 48.3%
2018-2020 93 18 19.4% 50 53.8%
Total 170 22 12.9% 88 51.8%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 49 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 94.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row